Linking Thinking

Why the Cloud Cannot Obscure the Scientific Method

There is lit­tle rea­son not to be enthused over the new avenues of research offered by increas­ingly com­pre­hen­sive and elec­tronic sci­en­tific data sets avail­able to us. But reac­tions to Chris Anderson’s naive claim that the del­uge of data makes the sci­en­tific method obso­lete reminds us why mod­els and the­o­ries are the best tools we have to under­stand­ing our world. For exam­ple, John Tim­mer responds: “Cor­re­la­tions are a way of catch­ing a scientist’s atten­tion, but the mod­els and mech­a­nisms that explain them are how we make the pre­dic­tions that not only advance sci­ence, but gen­er­ate prac­ti­cal applications.”

♦ ♦ ♦

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe without commenting