Linking Thinking

Cooked Books

Why are we still sur­prised when “non-fiction” is less than truth­ful? “The sad truth is that “non-fiction” has been unre­li­able from the begin­ning, no mat­ter how finely grained a sec­tion of human knowl­edge we wish to con­sider.” The sad­der truth is that jour­nal­ist fact-checking and aca­d­e­mic peer review are still the best alternatives.

♦ ♦ ♦

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe without commenting