Democratic, but dangerous too: how the web changed our world

What will our planet look like when we are all truly and well-connected? In her speech on inter­net free­dom at the New­seum in Wash­ing­ton last Thurs­day, Hilary Clin­ton declared that inter­net users must be “assured cer­tain basic freedoms” – freedom of expres­sion and of wor­ship, free­dom from want and from fear and, most intrigu­ingly, “free­dom to con­nect”. In sharp con­trast, we have the author­i­tar­ian approaches of coun­tries like China, Iran and Egypt, an over­whelm­ing com­mer­cial web that exploits the vast trails of per­sonal infor­ma­tion we leave behind, and the nar­row­ing prospects of infor­ma­tion we may wish to see when these inter­ests serve up what they think we want to see. Aleks Kro­to­ski looks at the social and psy­cho­log­i­cal impli­ca­tions of con­nect­ing and con­cludes that our rela­tion­ship with the web is a syn­ergy. “… as it draws us into its net­works and its hyper­links, we will shape them in our global image.” It is the most rev­o­lu­tion­ary evo­lu­tion that we have ever par­tic­i­pated in:

…who we are on the web is sim­ply a reflec­tion of who we already are offline. We project hier­ar­chi­cal sys­tems into the vir­tual world. We extend our inter­ests and make them hap­pen using the tools the web pro­vides. We seek out things that make us feel good about our­selves. The web is a mir­ror, and we have to face it in con­fi­dence, warts and all.