<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Portable Learner&#187; Linking Thinking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://portablelearner.com</link>
	<description>A website by Shanta Rohse on learning, technology and design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 21:23:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title><![CDATA[? Introducing the mesofact]]></title>
		<link>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/introducing-the-mesofact/</link>
		<comments>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/introducing-the-mesofact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 21:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engaging with online learning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portablelearner.com/818/introducing-the-mesofact/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Introducing the mesofactThere are facts that don’t change, like the height of Mount Everest, and facts that change a lot, like the weather. Then there are mesofacts, facts that are neither fast nor momentus, and so don’t receive the same scrutiny, but are still worthy of your attention. For example, the Periodic table has added 12 elements [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Introducing the mesofact<p>There are facts that don’t change, like the height of Mount Everest, and facts that change a lot, like the weather. Then there are mesofacts, facts that are neither fast nor momentus, and so don’t receive the same scrutiny, but are still worthy of your attention. For example, the Periodic table has added 12 elements since 1970. 400 new extrasolar planets have been <a href="http://planetquest.jpl.nasa.gov/timeline/timeline.html" title="PlanetQuest timeline">discovered</a> since the first one in 1995. The world’s population <a href="http://www.mesofacts.org/1/post/2010/01/world-population-by-continent.html" title="World Population by Continent">stands</a> at 6.8 million. Many dinosaurs were swift and warm-blooded. “Updating your mesofacts,” <a href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2010/02/28/warning_your_reality_is_out_of_date/" title="Mesofacts: Your Reality is Out of Date">says</a> Samuel Arbesman, “can change how you think about the world.” (And, I’m always drawn to insights that change how I think about the world):</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2010/02/28/warning_your_reality_is_out_of_date/" title="Samuel Arbesman"><p>Do you know the percentage of people in the world who use mobile phones? In 1997, the answer was 4 percent. By 2007, it was nearly 50 percent. The fraction of people who are mobile phone users is the kind of fact you might read in a magazine and quote at a cocktail party. But years later the number you would be quoting would not just be inaccurate, it would be seriously wrong. The difference between a tiny fraction of the world and half the globe is startling, and completely changes our view on global interconnectivity.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/introducing-the-mesofact/" rel="bookmark">Introducing the mesofact</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://portablelearner.com">Portable Learner</a> on March 2nd, 2010 <a href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Introducing the mesofact: http://portablelearner.com/?p=818">Tweet</a> this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/introducing-the-mesofact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title><![CDATA[? Learning styles: Reports of demise exaggerated]]></title>
		<link>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/learning-styles-reports-of-demise-exaggerated/</link>
		<comments>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/learning-styles-reports-of-demise-exaggerated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assimilating information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portablelearner.com/?p=813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Learning styles: Reports of demise exaggeratedThe idea that different kinds of learners (such as “auditory learners” and “visual learners”) learn best when they are taught in their preferred learning style modality has had a tenacious grip in classroom settings in recent decades. Here is yet another report, this one commissioned by Psychological Science in the Public Interest, that condemns the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Learning styles: Reports of demise exaggerated<p>The idea that different kinds of learners (such as “auditory learners” and “visual learners”) learn best when they are taught in their preferred learning style modality has had a tenacious grip in classroom settings in recent decades. Here is yet <a href="http://www.psychologicalscience.org/journals/index.cfm?journal=pspi&#038;content=pspi/9_3" title="Learning Styles: Concept and Evidence">another report</a>, this one commissioned by Psychological Science in the Public Interest, that condemns the use of learning styles in school settings. Frankly, it’s interesting if you are a teacher, trainer, parent or employed in the vast industry of learning style assessments, but it is less interesting if you are a learner or interested in personalized learning in non-structured settings. School is such a narrow slice of the learning landscape, and it distressing to hear of all the resources spent on promoting a suspect proposition, then again to quell it. These findings are not relevant to unstructured learning environments, and the strict type of randomized research designs advocated (e.g., classify learners into categories, then randomly assign the learners to use one of several different learning methods and assess effectiveness of the learning methods with a test given to all participants) is a steep hurdle. Thanks to Will Thalheimer for <a href="http://www.willatworklearning.com/2010/02/learning-styles-reviewed-by-association-for-psychological-science-and-found-wanting.html" title="Learning Styles Reviewed by Association for Psychological Science AND FOUND WANTING.">pointing</a> to the study.</p>
<p><a href="http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/learning-styles-reports-of-demise-exaggerated/" rel="bookmark">Learning styles: Reports of demise exaggerated</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://portablelearner.com">Portable Learner</a> on February 19th, 2010 <a href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Learning styles: Reports of demise exaggerated: http://portablelearner.com/?p=813">Tweet</a> this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/learning-styles-reports-of-demise-exaggerated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title><![CDATA[? Vaccines, The Lancet retraction and open scientific debate]]></title>
		<link>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/vaccines-lancet-open-scientific-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/vaccines-lancet-open-scientific-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portablelearner.com/?p=796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vaccines, The Lancet retraction and open scientific debateLast week, the prominent British medical journal The Lancet formally retracted a deeply flawed 1998 study that linked childhood measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine to autism. Despite a wealth of research that concludes there is no link, a decade of anti-vaccine sentiment is proving more difficult to retract. In an interview for On The Media, The Lancet’s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Vaccines, The Lancet retraction and open scientific debate<p>Last week, the prominent British medical journal <cite>The Lancet</cite> <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2810%2960175-7/fulltext" title="Retraction&acirc;??Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children : The Lancet">formally retracted</a> a <a href="http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2010-02/british-journal-retracts-controversial-1998-paper-linking-autism-and-vaccines" title="Lancet Retracts Controversial 1998 Study Linking Autism and Vaccines">deeply flawed 1998 study</a> that linked childhood measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine to autism. Despite a wealth of research that concludes there is no link, a decade of anti-vaccine sentiment is proving more difficult to retract. In an <a href="http://www.onthemedia.org/transcripts/2010/02/05/01" title="On The Media: Transcript of &quot;A Shot of Reality&quot;">interview</a> for <cite>On The Media</cite>, <cite>The Lancet’s</cite> editor Dr. Richard Horton weighs in on the state of open scientific debate:<br />
<blockquote>We used to think that we could publish speculative research which advanced interesting new ideas which may be wrong, but which were important to provoke debate and discussion. We don’t think that now. We don’t seem able to have a rational conversation in the public space about difficult controversial issues without people drawing a conclusion which could be very averse.…The 19th-century days where you could sit in the salon at the Royal Society and have a private conversation amongst your fellows just doesn’t exist anymore. So I think yeah, too much information in this particular case is a bad thing, which seems to go against every kind of democratic principle that we believe in. But in the case of science, it seems to be true.</p></blockquote>
<p>  But it is not. I can’t help but wonder if we had had this conversation, in public, ten years ago when the study was still “speculative research” we may well have averted the flawed decision to publish it in the first place. We need more information, not less, and more inclusive conversations, not narrowly confined to the medical community. The public may well have to engage the medical community in the public space “difficult conversations without drawing a conclusion that could be very averse…”</p>
<p><a href="http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/vaccines-lancet-open-scientific-debate/" rel="bookmark">Vaccines, The Lancet retraction and open scientific debate</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://portablelearner.com">Portable Learner</a> on February 9th, 2010 <a href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Vaccines, The Lancet retraction and open scientific debate: http://portablelearner.com/?p=796">Tweet</a> this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/vaccines-lancet-open-scientific-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title><![CDATA[? Real body language]]></title>
		<link>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/real-body-language/</link>
		<comments>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/real-body-language/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 03:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assimilating information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portablelearner.com/785/real-body-language/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Real body languageNatalie Angier reviews recent studies in the field of embodied cognition, which recognizes that we process information not only with our minds but with our entire bodies. For example, a person who thinking about the future may lean forward slightly, and person reflecting on the past my tip backwards. It seems the body can be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Real body language<p>Natalie Angier <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/02/science/02angier.html?pagewanted=all" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/02/science/02angier.html?pagewanted=all">reviews</a> recent studies in the field of <cite>embodied cognition</cite>, which recognizes that we process information not only with our minds but with our entire bodies. For example, a person who thinking about the future may lean forward slightly, and person reflecting on the past my tip backwards. It seems the body can be very literal-minded. Someone holding a warm drink is more likely to think well of other people than if they were holding a cold drink. Gesturing can help children master math. Our Cartesian mindset insists that thinking is the brain’s domain, but these studies hint at a nuanced two-way communication with the body.</p>
<p><a href="http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/real-body-language/" rel="bookmark">Real body language</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://portablelearner.com">Portable Learner</a> on February 1st, 2010 <a href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Real body language: http://portablelearner.com/?p=785">Tweet</a> this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/real-body-language/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title><![CDATA[? Surprising gaps in your self-knowledge]]></title>
		<link>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/gaps-self-knowledge/</link>
		<comments>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/gaps-self-knowledge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assimilating information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portablelearner.com/?p=784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surprising gaps in your self-knowledgeJeremy Dean frequently highlights classic social psychology research that helps us understand why we think and act the way we do. He turns to self-schema theory and a 1977 study by Hazel Markus for insight into why many of us are blissfully unaware of certain aspects of our personalities. Self-schema refer to the beliefs we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Surprising gaps in your self-knowledge<p>Jeremy Dean frequently <a href="http://www.spring.org.uk/2010/01/10-more-brilliant-social-psychology-studies.php" title="10 More Brilliant Social Psychology Studies: Why Smart People Do Dumb or Irrational Things | PsyBlog">highlights</a> classic social psychology research that helps us understand why we think and act the way we do. He <a href="http://www.spring.org.uk/2010/01/what-are-the-shocking-voids-in-your-self-knowledge.php" title="Self-Schemas: Finding The Surprising Gaps in Your Self-Knowledge?">turns</a> to self-schema theory and a 1977 study by Hazel Markus for insight into why many of us are blissfully unaware of certain aspects of our personalities. Self-schema refer to the beliefs we have about ourselves. We use them to understand and explain our behaviour, especially when that behaviour is significant to our self-conception. Once we have developed a schema, it is remarkably resilient. In this study Markus examined women who identified with independent/dependent schema and those who did not (that is, aschematic). Some of the participants believed they were independent, some did not, and the others didn’t know or, apparently, did not care. The aschematics are the most interesting category because they did not seam to realize whether or not they were independent —  a surprising gap in their self-knowledge. Markus’s original paper is <a href="http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/psp/35/2/63/" title="302 Found">available</a> at PyscNET.</p>
<p><a href="http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/gaps-self-knowledge/" rel="bookmark">Surprising gaps in your self-knowledge</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://portablelearner.com">Portable Learner</a> on January 31st, 2010 <a href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Surprising gaps in your self-knowledge: http://portablelearner.com/?p=784">Tweet</a> this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/gaps-self-knowledge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title><![CDATA[? Atoms to bits]]></title>
		<link>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/atoms-to-bits/</link>
		<comments>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/atoms-to-bits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engaging with online learning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portablelearner.com/?p=783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Atoms to bitsTuned in as I am to A History of the World in 100 Objects and the notion that humans make tools and tools remake humans, I couldn’t help but notice Chris Anderson claim that everyone now has the power to make complex things.  In the DIY culture of the internet, manufacturing will be radically [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Atoms to bits<p><a href="http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/history-world-objects/">Tuned in</a> as I am to <cite>A History of the World in 100 Objects</cite> and the notion that humans make tools and tools remake humans, I couldn’t help but notice Chris Anderson <a href="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/01/ff_newrevolution" title="In the Next Industrial Revolution, Atoms Are the New Bits | Magazine">claim</a> that <em>everyone</em> now has the power to make complex things.  In the DIY culture of the internet, manufacturing will be radically democratized; in the next industrial revolutions, “atoms are the new bits.” What was once mass produced will become mass personalized. Think on the ways in which we manage our daily lives, through our education systems, work practices, community services and governance, all of which are designed and coordinated with tools we have had at our disposal. What will these tools look like in the DIY model when collaboration, crowdsourcing and great ideas attracting like-minded individuals? The garage/basement examples Chris Anderson provides remind us that the manufacturing revolution is very much confined to hobbyist and boutique markets, not mainstream industry. But the whole notion of moving from mass production to mass personalization is rather intoxicating.</p>
<p><a href="http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/atoms-to-bits/" rel="bookmark">Atoms to bits</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://portablelearner.com">Portable Learner</a> on January 29th, 2010 <a href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Atoms to bits: http://portablelearner.com/?p=783">Tweet</a> this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/atoms-to-bits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title><![CDATA[? The cold hard facts of freezing to death]]></title>
		<link>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/cold-facts-freezing-death/</link>
		<comments>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/cold-facts-freezing-death/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 04:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reconceptualizing understandings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portablelearner.com/?p=782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The cold hard facts of freezing to deathPeter Stark could have simply defined hypothermia as the condition in which the body is at abnormally low body temperatures, one that needs treatment at body temperatures of 35℃ and becomes life threatening below 32.2℃. Certainly that is what most trainers would do. Instead he embeds the cold hard facts of freezing to death in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The cold hard facts of freezing to death<p>Peter Stark could have simply defined <em>hypothermia</em> as the condition in which the body is at abnormally low body temperatures, one that needs treatment at body temperatures of 35℃ and becomes life threatening below 32.2℃. Certainly that is what most trainers would do. Instead he <a href="http://outside.away.com/outside/magazine/0197/9701fefreez.html" title="As Freezing Persons Recollect the Snow--First Chill--Then Stupor--Then the Letting Go | Outside Online">embeds</a> the cold hard facts of freezing to death in a story that begins:<br />
<blockquote>When your Jeep spins lazily off the mountain road and slams backward into a snowbank, you don’t worry immediately about the cold. Your first thought is that you’ve just dented your bumper. Your second is that you’ve failed to bring a shovel. Your third is that you’ll be late for dinner. Friends are expecting you at their cabin around eight for a moonlight ski, a late dinner, a sauna. Nothing can keep you from that.</p></blockquote>
<p>It is an engrossing read. Narrative experiences can be so powerful. Some will transport you to another place and time in a way that is so compelling it seems real. A narrative like this could provide the structure for an entire training program. The story offers an organizing structure for new experiences and knowledge. It could shift the focus from a rote memorization of facts in a textbook to a diagnosis of a real-world condition.</p>
<p><a href="http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/cold-facts-freezing-death/" rel="bookmark">The cold hard facts of freezing to death</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://portablelearner.com">Portable Learner</a> on January 27th, 2010 <a href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=The cold hard facts of freezing to death: http://portablelearner.com/?p=782">Tweet</a> this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/cold-facts-freezing-death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title><![CDATA[? Telling a history of the world with objects]]></title>
		<link>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/history-world-objects/</link>
		<comments>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/history-world-objects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portablelearner.com/?p=781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Telling a history of the world with objectsThis past week I’ve been taking A History of the World in 100 Objects for a spin in my mp3 player. It is an extraordinary, inspiring, and slightly crazy British Museumm/BBC co-production based on the belief that objects can open up news ways of understanding two million years of human history. It revolves around a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Telling a history of the world with objects<p>This past week I’ve been taking <cite>A History of the World in 100 Objects</cite> for a <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/series/ahow" title="BBC - Podcasts - A History of the World in 100 Objects">spin</a> in my mp3 player. It is an extraordinary, inspiring, and slightly crazy <a href="http://www.britishmuseum.org/ahistoryoftheworld" title="A History of the World in 100 objects &amp;rsaquo; The British Museum">British Museumm</a>/<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/ahistoryoftheworld/explorerflash/" title="BBC - A History of the World - Object Gallery">BBC</a> co-production based on the belief that objects can open up news ways of understanding two million years of human history. It revolves around a series of 15 minute radio spots that take one artefact, tell its story about the people who made it, and tell new stories reinterpreted by subsequent generations. I’m at episode four, and the narratives are gripping. The plot emerging is not the history of any one nation or people, but rather of the interconnections and common ground they all share. Amartya Sen explains this in the first episode:</p>
<blockquote><p>I think what is really very important to recognize is that, when we look at the history of the world, we’re not looking at the history of different civilizations truncated and separated from each other. They’ve a huge amount of contact with each other, there is a kind of inter-connectedness. So I’ve always felt, not to think of the history of the world as a history of civilizations, but as a history of world civilizations evolving in often similar, often diverse ways, always interacting with each other. And this is a very different view from the clash of civilizations to which we were exposed some years ago, as a way to understand enmity in the world. Enmity has not been the general condition of the relationship between people across the world in history.</p></blockquote>
<p>The programme is fully socially mediated, both <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/ahistoryoftheworld/objects/add" title="http://www.bbc.co.uk/ahistoryoftheworld/objects/add">online</a> and offline with regional museum programs; it will be interesting to see if the stories sustain the momentum generated in these first episodes.</p>
<p><a href="http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/history-world-objects/" rel="bookmark">Telling a history of the world with objects</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://portablelearner.com">Portable Learner</a> on January 26th, 2010 <a href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Telling a history of the world with objects: http://portablelearner.com/?p=781">Tweet</a> this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/history-world-objects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title><![CDATA[? Democratic, but dangerous too: how the web changed our world]]></title>
		<link>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/democratic-but-dangerous/</link>
		<comments>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/democratic-but-dangerous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 02:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portablelearner.com/?p=777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democratic, but dangerous too: how the web changed our worldWhat will our planet look like when we are all truly and well-connected? In her speech on internet freedom at the Newseum in Washington last Thursday, Hilary Clinton declared that internet users must be “assured certain basic freedoms”–freedom of expression and of worship, freedom from want and from fear and, most intriguingly, “freedom to connect”. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Democratic, but dangerous too: how the web changed our world<p>What will our planet look like when we are all truly and well-connected? In her speech on internet freedom at the Newseum in Washington last Thursday, Hilary Clinton <a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/01/21/internet_freedom?page=full" title="Internet Freedom">declared</a> that internet users must be “assured certain basic freedoms”–freedom of expression and of worship, freedom from want and from fear and, most intriguingly, “freedom to connect”. In sharp contrast, we have the authoritarian approaches of countries like China, Iran and Egypt, an overwhelming commercial web that exploits the vast trails of personal information we leave behind, and the narrowing prospects of information we may wish to see when these interests serve up what they think we want to see. Aleks Krotoski looks at the social and psychological implications of connecting and <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/jan/24/internet-revolution-changing-world" title="Democratic, but dangerous too: how the web changed our world">concludes</a> that our relationship with the web is a synergy. “… as it draws us into its networks and its hyperlinks, we will shape them in our global image.” It is the most revolutionary evolution that we have ever participated in:<br />
<blockquote>…who we are on the web is simply a reflection of who we already are offline. We project hierarchical systems into the virtual world. We extend our interests and make them happen using the tools the web provides. We seek out things that make us feel good about ourselves. The web is a mirror, and we have to face it in confidence, warts and all.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/democratic-but-dangerous/" rel="bookmark">Democratic, but dangerous too: how the web changed our world</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://portablelearner.com">Portable Learner</a> on January 24th, 2010 <a href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Democratic, but dangerous too: how the web changed our world: http://portablelearner.com/?p=777">Tweet</a> this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/democratic-but-dangerous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title><![CDATA[? When the media is the disaster: Covering Haiti]]></title>
		<link>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/when-the-media-is-the-disaster-covering-haiti/</link>
		<comments>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/when-the-media-is-the-disaster-covering-haiti/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shanta Rohse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linking Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluating the quality of digital resources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portablelearner.com/?p=776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the media is the disaster: Covering HaitiThe Los Angeles Times ran a series of photographs of desperate Haitians coping in the aftermath of a devastating earthquake with captions that kept deploying words like “looting.” Would you enter a collapsed supermarket to take food to starving children and babies? Then you too are a looter. These pictures do convey desperation, says Rebecca [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[When the media is the disaster: Covering Haiti<p>The Los Angeles Times <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/photography/la-fg-haiti-hires-html,0,7123168.htmlstory" title="Haiti: Coping with the Aftermath">ran</a> a series of photographs of desperate Haitians coping in the aftermath of a devastating earthquake with captions that kept deploying words like “looting.” Would you enter a collapsed supermarket to take food to starving children and babies? Then you too are a looter. These pictures do convey desperation, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rebecca-solnit/when-the-media-is-the-dis_b_431617.html" title"When the Media Is the Disaster: Covering Haiti" title="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rebecca-solnit/when-the-media-is-the-dis_b_431617.html">says</a> Rebecca Solnit, but they don’t convey crime. She argues that the media tend to be obsessed with property and headlines about assaults on property, and misrepresent events as <em>looting</em> or <em>panic</em>, needlessly inciting hostility and hysteria on the part of local authorities and causing more suffering. When the rest of us contemplate the Haitians’ plight through media reports, we need to remember that:<br />
<blockquote>…what is absolutely accurate, in Haiti right now, and on Earth always, is that human life matters more than property, that the survivors of a catastrophe deserve our compassion and our understanding of their plight, and that we live and die by words and ideas, and it matters desperately that we get them right.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/when-the-media-is-the-disaster-covering-haiti/" rel="bookmark">When the media is the disaster: Covering Haiti</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://portablelearner.com">Portable Learner</a> on January 22nd, 2010 <a href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=When the media is the disaster: Covering Haiti: http://portablelearner.com/?p=776">Tweet</a> this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://portablelearner.com/linking-thinking/when-the-media-is-the-disaster-covering-haiti/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
