Is intelligence a single, general factor, or is it more plural and fragmented? Are we actually getting smarter, or are we just getting better at taking tests? This month’s Cato Unbound offers up a cognitive feast of viewspoints. James Flynn, who opts for the plural, fragmented view of IQ, argues that the envirnoment makes a lot of difference in terms of effect on our level of cognitive functioning. Once we grasp that “the brain is much more like our muscles than we had thought, ” we can do more to improve cognitive performance by doing more to exercise the brain. “If only we who teach could make more of our “subjects” fall in love with ideas. Then we would have truly effective interventions.”
Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Notify me of followup comments via e-mail
Subscribe without commenting E-Mail:
The IQ Conundrum
Is intelligence a single, general factor, or is it more plural and fragmented? Are we actually getting smarter, or are we just getting better at taking tests? This month’s Cato Unbound offers up a cognitive feast of viewspoints. James Flynn, who opts for the plural, fragmented view of IQ, argues that the envirnoment makes a lot of difference in terms of effect on our level of cognitive functioning. Once we grasp that “the brain is much more like our muscles than we had thought, ” we can do more to improve cognitive performance by doing more to exercise the brain. “If only we who teach could make more of our “subjects” fall in love with ideas. Then we would have truly effective interventions.”