Category Archives: Linking Thinking

Link­ing to what oth­ers are think­ing about learn­ing as a way to explore how we learn online.

A
The Art of Doing Something Well

Tech­nol­ogy can make us for­get the full mean­ing of crafts­man­ship, to lose sight of its human dimen­sion. But even in our post-industrial soci­ety, west­ern economies con­tin­u­ally cre­ate niche mar­kets for fine crafts­man­ship like wine-making, arti­sanal cof­fee, linux soft­ware, hand­made furniture.

♦ ♦ ♦

L
Can Social Bookmarking Improve Web Search?

Lots of inter­est­ing con­clu­sions in this study about social bookmarking’s role in web search: Tags are present in the page­text of 50% of the pages they anno­tate and in the titles of 16% of the pages they anno­tate. Tags are in con­text and many tagged pages would be dis­cov­ered by a search engine (p.8).

♦ ♦ ♦

E
Why is Web 2.0 Failing in Biology

A pessimist’s view of why sci­en­tists do not par­tic­i­pate in social net­work­ing sites. Accord­ing to an anony­mous post­doc: “I can barely keep up iwth the lit­er­a­ture in my field and with what my lab­mates are doing. Who has time to spend read­ing some grad student’s blog?”

♦ ♦ ♦

N
Purposeful Networking

Stephanie Sandifer’s point, that pur­pose­ful net­work­ing is a 21st cen­tury skill and should become part of main­stream edu­ca­tion, is a proof-of-concept post: it would not have hap­pened with­out Twitter.

♦ ♦ ♦

E
With a Few More Brains

Nicholoas Kristof talks about the dumb­ing down of dis­course in Amer­ica, and sug­gests that “the com­plex and incom­plete solu­tion is a greater empha­sis on edu­ca­tion at every level.”

♦ ♦ ♦

E
The Art of Literature and the Science of Literature

Sto­ries can offer so much plea­sure that study­ing them hardly seems like work. In fact, says Brian Boyd, “Atten­tion – engage­ment in the activ­ity – mat­ters before meaning.”

♦ ♦ ♦

E
The battle for Wikipedia’s soul

It is the biggest ency­clo­pe­dia in his­tory and the most suc­cess­ful exam­ple of user-generated con­tent. The inevitable result of grow­ing pains, all kinds of rules have been devised to mea­sure a subject’s wor­thi­ness for inclu­sion in Wikipedia (or “nota­bil­i­ty”, in the jar­gon of Wikipedi­ans). But now the “thresh­old for writ­ing arti­cles for Wikipedia is now so high that very few peo­ple actu­ally do it.”

♦ ♦ ♦

R
A Convergence Of Civilizations

Adam Kirsch on the con­ver­gence of east and west: “…if the West has achieved things we hold sacred – as we should – it has always been the result of inter­nal strug­gle. What are now the cher­ished prin­ci­ples of West­ern civ­i­liza­tion, from democ­racy to racial equal­ity, have all started out as cri­tiques and became gen­er­ally accepted only after long and some­times vio­lent conflict.”

♦ ♦ ♦

V
Cooked Books

Why are we still sur­prised when “non-fiction” is less than truth­ful? “The sad truth is that “non-fiction” has been unre­li­able from the begin­ning, no mat­ter how finely grained a sec­tion of human knowl­edge we wish to con­sider.” The sad­der truth is that jour­nal­ist fact-checking and aca­d­e­mic peer review are still the best alternatives.

♦ ♦ ♦

N
1,000 True Fans

Kevin Kelly does the math for artists in a net­worked age, and makes it all seem pos­si­ble: A cre­ator, such as an artist, musi­cian, pho­tog­ra­pher, craftsper­son, per­former, ani­ma­tor, designer, video­maker, or author — in other words, any­one pro­duc­ing works of art — needs to acquire only 1,000 True Fans to make a living.

♦ ♦ ♦