Category Archives: Linking Thinking

Link­ing to what oth­ers are think­ing about learn­ing as a way to explore how we learn online.

R
Never Say Die: Why We Can’t Imagine Death

Jesse Bering on why so many of us think our minds con­tinue on after we die; rather than being a by-product of reli­gion or an emo­tional secu­rity blan­ket, such beliefs stem from the very nature of our consciousness.

And so per­son per­ma­nence may be the final cog­ni­tive hur­dle that gets in the way of our effec­tively real­iz­ing the dead as they truly are — infi­nitely in situ, inan­i­mate car­bon residue. Instead it’s much more “nat­ural” to imag­ine them as exist­ing in some vague, unob­serv­able locale, very much liv­ing their dead lives.

♦ ♦ ♦

V
You’re Sick. Now What? Knowledge is Power.

Oncol­o­gist Marisa Weiss’s advice to those inclined to research their own med­ical care: it’s manda­tory. “The time you have with your doc­tor is get­ting pro­gres­sively shorter, yet there’s so much more to talk about. You have to pre­pare for this impor­tant meet­ing.” This New York Times spe­cial sec­tion, Decod­ing Your Health, offers use­ful advice on eval­u­at­ing what you might find: a primer on inter­pret­ing med­ical stud­ies shows that “no mat­ter how com­pelling and excit­ing a hypoth­e­sis is, we don’t know whether it works with­out clin­i­cal tri­als”; and self-diagnosis via the inter­net may well prove you have a fool for a doc­tor.

♦ ♦ ♦

L
Ocean View

Jesse Smith’s review of the recently ren­o­vated US National Museum of Nat­ural His­tory points out the meta­mor­pho­sis from stuffy sci­ence insti­tu­tion to mod­ern entity that must “edu­cate with­out bor­ing, elu­ci­date with­out offend­ing, and advo­cate with­out annoy­ing.” For exam­ple, the museum offers no lin­ear pro­gres­sion through the exhibit, but rather any num­ber of nat­ural courses that reflect the chaos of the ocean itself:

Earth’s oceans, we are reminded, form a sin­gle inter­con­nected body of water. Its species and cur­rents are not con­strained by labels such as Atlantic and Pacific, so why should their inter­pre­ta­tion? Sec­tions meld seam­lessly into one another, but infor­ma­tion in each is pre­sented in a con­strained man­ner so that if you do, say, jump from a stuffed pen­guin in Poles to a pre­served Coela­canth (the giant fish con­sid­ered extinct until a fish­er­man found one off the coast of South African in 1938), a vis­i­tor can still learn or expe­ri­ence at each. With the excep­tion of the Jour­ney Through Time exhibit — which explores the slow march of evo­lu­tion that began under­wa­ter — there is never a pro­gres­sion to fol­low, no order by which a vis­i­tor must read or look. In this way, tour­ing the hall feels a lot like surf­ing the Web.

♦ ♦ ♦

V
Taking the Earth’s Temperature

How do we mea­sure our planet’s global mean tem­per­a­ture, and com­pare it to a record dat­ing back hun­dreds of thou­sands of years, a com­par­i­son cen­tral to dis­cus­sions about cli­mate change? Jor­dan R. Raney’s descrip­tion of the inge­nious but impaired proxy mea­sures from tree rings to coral reefs are meant to encour­age skep­ti­cism for some of the more extreme claims that have been made. Unfor­tu­nately, we still need to make deci­sions about cli­mate change, how­ever incom­plete, uncer­tain the data we have is. In fact, that is the challenge.

♦ ♦ ♦

A
Why is laughter almost non-existent in ancient Greek sculpture?

Elec­tri­cal Engi­neer­ing pro­fes­sor Yan­nis Tsi­vidis inno­cently asks, why is it that we very rarely see laugh­ter depicted in ancient Greek sculp­ture? From the range of schol­arly answers, you get the pecu­liar sense that we “mod­erns” are not in a posi­tion to give an answer.

♦ ♦ ♦

E
No Heaven on Earth

Why are so many of us so skep­ti­cal when con­fronted with the over­whelm­ing evi­dence for envi­ron­men­tal con­se­quences of destroy­ing every­thing we come in con­tact with? In her review of Amer­i­can Earth, an anthol­ogy of Amer­i­can envi­ron­men­tal­ist views, Ver­lyn Klinkenborg has this reac­tion to the bar­rage of evi­dence and entreaties to recon­nect with nature:

After a day or two, I found myself read­ing this anthol­ogy as if it were a series of reports from a dis­tant planet in a dis­tant time — as an appen­dix, per­haps, to Doris Lessing’s Cano­pus in Argos nov­els. Read­ing Amer­i­can Earth in that light helped make sev­eral things clear. First, each doc­u­ment in the vol­ume is a minor­ity report — some­times a minor­ity of one. The assump­tions, the hopes, the argu­ments in nearly every one of these pieces, no mat­ter when they were writ­ten, are con­tra­dicted by the way the vast major­ity of Amer­i­cans live and by the polit­i­cal and eco­nomic struc­tures that deter­mine that lifestyle. Sec­ond, the fun­da­men­tal envi­ron­men­tal­ist argu­ments — the fun­da­men­tal per­cep­tions — are unchang­ing over time; only the details vary. We are still catch­ing up to Thoreau, still com­ing to terms with the out­rage George Perkins Marsh expressed in 1864, his wor­ries about “cli­matic excess” and our “rest­less love of change.” Third, writ­ers in every gen­er­a­tion take a crack at find­ing the crys­talline argu­ment that will induce an epiphany in skep­ti­cal read­ers — for noth­ing less than an epiphany will do to per­suade them to change the way they go about liv­ing. Yet every gen­er­a­tion fails, in part because skep­ti­cal read­ers so sel­dom pick up this kind of writ­ing or sub­mit to its evidence.

Her con­clu­sion is also worth not­ing. She reaches for Kafka (There is infi­nite hope, but not for us.) and writes regret­fully: I would say some­thing dif­fer­ent if I could. I have every faith in nature’s recu­per­a­tive powers.…What I doubt is our abil­ity, as a species, to see and, hav­ing seen, to con­tinue to pay attention.

♦ ♦ ♦

N
How To Succeed In Business Without Putting People Last

At some point in your surf­ing escapades you begin to grasp that the pro­found impact of the inter­net on learn­ing is not its vast stores of con­tent, but its abil­ity to sup­port the var­i­ous facets of social learn­ing. You begin to appre­ci­ate that knowl­edge is not just a lump of some­thing that is passed on via var­i­ous ped­a­gog­i­cal tac­tics, and your atten­tion begins to shift from the con­tent of a sub­ject to the learn­ing activ­i­ties and human inter­ven­tions around which that con­tent is sit­u­ated. John Seely Brown iden­ti­fies this as a shift from “learn­ing about” to “learn­ing to be.” And “learn­ing to be” calls for inter­per­sonal skills not eas­ily acquired by text­book learn­ing. It’s in this con­text I found myself read­ing back issues of In Char­ac­ter, which exam­ines virtues within our com­mu­ni­ties our fam­i­lies and our­selves. The cur­rent issue delves into com­pas­sion; this obser­va­tion from Howard Behar who empha­sizes com­pas­sion as a vital com­po­nent of acquir­ing per­sonal lead­er­ship skills caught my attention:

Peo­ple are not assets. Car­ing isn’t just about admir­ing the charis­matic lead­ers, the peo­ple that every­body likes, or the in crowd. This is the big car­ing we do that shows we “care, like we really mean it.” It’s about words and actions that every­body sees and rec­og­nizes. There’s an old adage that says, “Peo­ple don’t care how much you know, they want to know how much you care.”

♦ ♦ ♦

A
Memories, Emotion and the Nose

Natalie Ang­ier reports from the Inter­na­tional Sym­po­sium on Olfac­tion and Taste held in San Fran­cisco, includ­ing this insight into how smells, feel­ings and mem­o­ries become so eas­ily and inti­mately entan­gled: “With a phone num­ber, if you get a new one, a week later you may have for­got­ten the old one,” Dr. Herz said. “With smells, it’s the other way around. The first asso­ci­a­tion is bet­ter than the second.”

♦ ♦ ♦

A
Making Decisions Tires Your Brain

Mar­ket­ing research involv­ing mak­ing choices reveals the brain as a mus­cle: when depleted it comes less effec­tive. Mak­ing choices exhausts what is known as exec­u­tive resources, and “down­stream” deci­sions are affected adversely when we are forced to choose with a fatigued brain. Not only does this explain why I always pick plain yogurt in the refrig­er­a­tor isle, but sug­gests that if we’ve just spent lots of time focus­ing on a par­tic­u­lar task, exer­cis­ing self-control or even if we’ve just made lots of seem­ingly minor choices, then we prob­a­bly shouldn’t try to make a major decision.

♦ ♦ ♦

N
Don’t Share — Build

Vic­tor New­man on the futil­ity of every­one shar­ing every­thing in an orga­ni­za­tion: The first prob­lem is the implicit eco­nomic par­a­digm peo­ple apply to ideas and knowl­edge: if every­thing is shared, it will be per­ceived to have lit­tle or no value. Sec­ond, you can spend as much time inter­pret­ing shared things of low value as high. Third, peo­ple will only share with those whom they respect and from whom they can expect a return or who share the same prob­lem of pre­serv­ing or rein­vent­ing iden­tity. These peo­ple don’t always work in the same orga­ni­za­tion. And fourth, not every­one is either pre-disposed or equipped to cre­ate (leave alone share) knowledge.

♦ ♦ ♦