Category Archives: Linking Thinking

Linking to what others are thinking about learning as a way to explore how we learn online.

A
The Myth of Multitasking

E-mails pour­ing in, cell phones ring­ing, tele­vi­sions blar­ing, pod­casts stream­ing – the great media din that has become an expected part of our lives is one in which we ration our atten­tion among many com­pet­ing tasks. Unfor­tu­nately, Chris­tine Rosen points to a spate of recent stud­ies indi­cat­ing that not only is mul­ti­task­ing a poor strat­egy for learn­ing, the learn­ing you do man­age while mul­ti­task­ing is less flex­i­ble and more spe­cial­ized, so you can­not retrieve the infor­ma­tion as easily.

♦ ♦ ♦

L
Start Pages as Environments for Self-Organized Learners

Start pages like Netvibes and Page­flakes are not specif­i­cally designed for edu­ca­tional pur­poses, but as Malinka Ivanova points out, they are flex­i­ble enough to poten­tially sup­port self-organized learn­ing and research envi­ron­ments. In this pre­sen­ta­tion, she com­pares var­i­ous start pages in terms of a model of mul­ti­chan­nel learn­ing in which learn­ers may play a a wide range of roles: authors, con­trib­u­tors, dis­trib­u­tors, searchers, mod­er­a­tors, review­ers, edi­tors, researchers, or evaluators.

♦ ♦ ♦

L
Q-Tools: An Approach for Discovery and Knowledge Work

Not­ing that Google rec­og­nizes that the inter­net does not need to orga­nized until you have a ques­tion in search of an answer, Dave Gray points out that ques­tions may be the most basic tools for gain­ing knowl­edge and work­ing with infor­ma­tion. His stan­dard set of ques­tions offers an inter­est­ing way for infor­ma­tions man­age­ment sys­tems like feed read­ers and email clients eto orga­nize and manip­u­late infor­ma­tion. Exam­ples of Q-tools include the Prism (one input, mul­ti­ple out­puts), the Razor (binary sort­ing), the Gen­er­a­tor (cre­ates new infor­ma­tion), the Peeler (dri­ves atten­tion to deeper lev­els), and more.

♦ ♦ ♦

E
Frankenstein in the Universe

Can we shape tech­nol­ogy as much as it shapes us? Or do we need to resign our­selves to the specter of tech­nol­ogy out of con­trol? If we do argues Luke Fer­nan­dez, we truly do become its vic­tims:

But even if our lives are con­strained and pushed in cer­tain direc­tions, we have some agency. To deny that would be to suc­cumb to the most nihilis­tic form of tech­no­log­i­cal deter­min­ism. If we believe that we can shape tech­nol­ogy as much as it shapes us we can hold out the hope of at least play­ing some minor role in influ­enc­ing the direc­tion that the uni­ver­sity takes in the infor­ma­tion age.

♦ ♦ ♦

E
Critical Theory: Ideology Critique and the Myths of E-Learning

Norm Friesen uses crit­i­cal the­ory to de-mystify three par­tic­u­lar truths or myths in the e-learning domain…that 1) we live in a knowl­edge econ­omy, 2) learn­ers enjoy any­where any­time access, and 3) edu­ca­tional and social change is an inevitable con­se­quence of tech­no­log­i­cal change.

Under­stand­ing tech­nol­ogy as a scene of strug­gle rather than as a des­tiny or fait accom­pli might also help to guide the explo­ration of metaphors other than “impact” or “dis­sem­i­na­tion” when inquir­ing into the rela­tion­ship between tech­nol­ogy and chang­ing insti­tu­tions and practices.

♦ ♦ ♦

L
Voices Carry

Is it a prob­lem, asks Lawrence Hill, that many of the most famous and endur­ing fic­tional accounts of African Amer­i­cans have been penned by whites? A solu­tion to this trend of ignor­ing African-American writ­ers is to incor­po­rate mem­oirs into the body of Civil War lit­er­a­ture into the curriculum:

What’s strik­ing about such nar­ra­tives is the imme­di­acy of expres­sion. These authors have a fun­da­men­tal point to make, one of such per­sonal urgency that the reader can hardly turn away. Between each line breathes a voice that seems to whis­per: This is my name, this is when I was born, this is who I am and how I have lived, and I am going to assert my own human­ity by set­ting my story down on paper. If we are to per­suade book­stores, review­ers, librar­i­ans, and cur­ricu­lum writ­ers to look for fresh lit­er­a­ture touch­ing on the African-American expe­ri­ence, and pre­vail on teach­ers to exer­cise more imag­i­na­tion than merely shov­ing the old pile of school edi­tions of To Kill a Mock­ing­bird at yet another class of yawn­ing stu­dents, it may be mem­oir that does the trick.

♦ ♦ ♦

R
In Defense of Hulk

What if Ang Lee’s 2003 Hulk movie isn’t as bad as every­one said it was? Comic-book adap­ta­tions typ­i­cally invent new adven­tures for their pro­tag­o­nists while remain­ing rel­a­tively faith­ful to the back story of their heroes. Lee, how­ever, reimag­ined the story of the Hulk, blend­ing ele­ments from the comic book, the tele­vi­sion show that aired in the ‘70s and ‘80s, and his own imag­i­na­tion. The ver­dict? Comic-book fans, crit­ics, and every­one in between agreed: It stunk.

♦ ♦ ♦

N
Darwinmania!

The story of Dar­win and his big idea of evo­lu­tion through nat­ural selec­tion offers numer­ous insights into how ideas become wide­spread. For exam­ple, why is it Dar­win we cel­e­brate above the oth­ers who thought of it first (William Wells and Patrick Matthew), or arguably con­ceived of it bet­ter (Alfred Rus­sel Wal­lace)? The rea­son, says Olivia Jud­son is the “Ori­gin,” which changed our view of other species and our­selves through relent­less evidence.

♦ ♦ ♦

A
The Meaning of the Butterfly

Peter Dizikes points out that while pop cul­ture ref­er­ences to the but­ter­fly effect are not just bad physics, they also reveal how the pub­lic thinks about sci­ence: They expose the grow­ing chasm between what the pub­lic expects from sci­en­tific research — that is, a series of ever more pre­cise answers about the world we live in — and the realms of uncer­tainty into which mod­ern sci­ence is tak­ing us.

♦ ♦ ♦

E
How to Unleash Your Creativity

John Houtz, Julia Cameron and Robert Epstein, all experts on cre­ativ­ity, and each with dif­fer­ent back­grounds and per­spec­tives offer prac­ti­cal tac­tics to unleash your cre­ative self. Their advice inter­sects at four dif­fer­ent skills sets essen­tial for cre­ative expres­sion: cap­ture new ideas they occur to you, chal­lenge your­self with tough prob­lems, broaden your inter­ests in new things, and sur­round your­self with inter­est­ing peo­ple and things.

♦ ♦ ♦