Peter Dizikes points out that while pop culture references to the butterfly effect are not just bad physics, they also reveal how the public thinks about science: They expose the growing chasm between what the public expects from scientific research — that is, a series of ever more precise answers about the world we live in — and the realms of uncertainty into which modern science is taking us.
They expose the growing chasm between what the public expects from scientific research — that is, a series of ever more precise answers about the world we live in — and the realms of uncertainty into which modern science is taking us.
Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Notify me of followup comments via e-mail
Subscribe without commenting E-Mail:
The Meaning of the Butterfly
Peter Dizikes points out that while pop culture references to the butterfly effect are not just bad physics, they also reveal how the public thinks about science: