"The best thing for being sad," replied Merlin, beginning to puff and blow, "is to learn something. That's the only thing that never fails. You may grow old and trembling in your anatomies, you may lie awake at night listening to the disorder of your veins, you may miss your only love, you may see the world about you devastated by evil lunatics, or know your honour trampled in the sewers of baser minds. There is only one thing for it then — to learn. Learn why the world wags and what wags it. That is the only thing which the mind can never exhaust, never alienate, never be tortured by, never fear or distrust, and never dream of regretting. Learning is the only thing for you. Look what a lot of things there are to learn." — T.H. White, The Once and Future King

A website by Shanta Rohse on learning, technology and design

Recently in: Portable Learner

Portable Learner chihuahua

The continuing education of an educator

A
Memory Training Shown to Turn Up Brainpower

Care­fully struc­tured train­ing in work­ing mem­ory based on a vari­a­tion of the Con­cen­tra­tion card game leads to improve­ments in fluid intel­li­gence–the kind of men­tal abil­ity that lets us solve new prob­lems with­out hav­ing any pre­vi­ous expe­ri­ence, and that had been widely believed to be an imutable trait.

♦ ♦ ♦

R
Can You Become a Creature of New Habits?

What is the con­nec­tion among habits, cre­ativ­ity and inno­va­tion? When we con­sciously develop new habits, we cre­ate par­al­lel synap­tic paths, and even entirely new brain cells, that can jump our trains of thought onto new, inno­v­a­tive tracks.

♦ ♦ ♦

N
Blogs, Public Intellectuals and the Academy

While the dom­i­nant trope about pub­lic intel­lec­tu­als is that they ain’t what they used to be, Daniel Drezner is rel­a­tively bull­ish:

Over time the acad­e­m­iza­tion of intel­lec­tual out­put cre­ated bar­ri­ers to the flour­ish­ing of pub­lic intel­lec­tu­als. The pro­lif­er­a­tion of blogs reverses that trend in sev­eral ways. Weblogs have facil­i­tated the rise of a new class of non-academic intellectuals.…For aca­d­e­mics aspir­ing to be pub­lic intel­lec­tu­als, weblogs allow net­works to develop that cross the dis­ci­pli­nary and hier­ar­chi­cal stric­tures of the acad­emy – and expand beyond the academy.

♦ ♦ ♦

A
The New Paternalism

Richard Thaler and Cass Sun­stein artic­u­late an approach to design­ing social and eco­nomic poli­cies that incor­po­rates an under­stand­ing of people’s cog­ni­tive lim­i­ta­tions: pol­icy mak­ers should nudge peo­ple into mak­ing good deci­sions.

♦ ♦ ♦

V
The Stupidity of Dignity

Steven Pinker dis­misses dig­nity as a basis for bioethics dis­cus­sions in bio­med­ical research, which US con­ser­v­a­tives and reli­gious lead­ers are invok­ing to dis­miss poten­tially life-saving med­ical advances. Unfor­tu­nately “over­ween­ing hubris” char­ac­ter­izes most for­mal dis­cus­sions of real revolutions:

In every age, prophets fore­see dystopias that never mate­ri­al­ize, while fail­ing to antic­i­pate the real rev­o­lu­tions. Had there been a President’s Coun­cil on Cyberethics in the 1960s, no doubt it would have decried the threat of the Inter­net, since it would inex­orably lead to 1984, or to com­put­ers “tak­ing over” like HAL in 2001. Con­ser­v­a­tive bioethi­cists pre­sume to sooth­say the out­come of the quin­tes­sen­tially unpre­dictable endeavor called sci­en­tific research. And they would stage-manage the kinds of social change that, in a free soci­ety, only emerge as hun­dreds of mil­lions of peo­ple weigh the costs and ben­e­fits of new devel­op­ments for them­selves, adjust­ing their mores and deal­ing with spe­cific harms as they arise, as they did with in vitro fer­til­iza­tion and the Internet.

♦ ♦ ♦

R
Dare To Be Yourself

Real­iz­ing an authen­tic life can be painful, exhaust­ing, seem­ingly impos­si­ble, and one of our deep­est psy­cho­log­i­cal needs. Psy­chother­a­pist and for­mer monk Thomas Moore on the role that fail­ures in play under­stand­ing self: “Peo­ple carry around a heavy bur­den of not feel­ing authen­tic because they have failed mar­riages and their work life hasn’t gone the way it should, and they’ve dis­ap­pointed every­body, includ­ing them­selves. When peo­ple think of these as just fail­ures, as opposed to learn­ing expe­ri­ences, they don’t have to feel the weight of their lives or the choices they’ve made. That dis­own­ing cre­ates a divi­sion that becomes the sense of inauthenticity.”

♦ ♦ ♦

E
Does your brain have a mind of its own?

Why can’t we stick to our goals like “I will lose weight” or “I plan to fin­ish this arti­cle before the dead­line. “Nice thoughts, but not for­mu­lated in terms that your ances­tral, reflex­ive brain might under­stand,” says psy­chol­o­gist Gary Mar­cus. The work around? “Trans­late those abstract goals into a form your ances­tral sys­tems – which traf­fic largely in dumb reflexes – can under­stand: if-then. If you find your­self in a par­tic­u­lar sit­u­a­tion, then take a spe­cific action.”

♦ ♦ ♦

A
Want to Remember Everything You’ll Ever Learn?

The spac­ing effect posits that the best time to study some­thing is at the moment you are about to for­get it – an insight that was use­less in the real world, until Piotr Woz­niak intro­duced Super­Memo.

♦ ♦ ♦

L
Death of the Guidebook: Lost in a Cutthroat World

Chris Tay­lor calls “desk updates” the travel guide­book industry’s “dirty secret.” “In times past, the only way to research a guide­book was to actu­ally go there — the alter­na­tive, pla­gia­ris­ing another guide­book, was, and still is, dif­fi­cult to cover up. Today, you can sit at home and Google the town you might oth­er­wise be explor­ing on foot, and hope­fully some ran­dom blog­ger has done the leg­work for you.” But the dirty part is not the fact that they stayed at home, it is the mis­rep­re­sen­ta­tion of the source of their exper­tise and the betrayal of their read­ers’ trust. They should learn from the best blog­gers: write every­where (includ­ing from home), bor­row from every­one, give credit where it’s due, and add value to the con­ver­sa­tion from your own gen­uine experiences.

♦ ♦ ♦

R
Noble Eagles, Nasty Pigeons, Biased Humans

Natalie Ang­ier explains bio­big­otry: “If you have two impor­tant birds from the same region of Latin Amer­ica, said Mr. Fraser [psy­cho­log­i­cal con­ser­va­tion­al­ist], one a hyacinth macaw that looks like fly­ing jew­elry and can vocal­ize like a human, the other a storm petrel that is brown, squawky and cakes the coast­line with guano, guess which face ends up on the next fund-raising calendar.”

♦ ♦ ♦