"The best thing for being sad," replied Merlin, beginning to puff and blow, "is to learn something. That's the only thing that never fails. You may grow old and trembling in your anatomies, you may lie awake at night listening to the disorder of your veins, you may miss your only love, you may see the world about you devastated by evil lunatics, or know your honour trampled in the sewers of baser minds. There is only one thing for it then — to learn. Learn why the world wags and what wags it. That is the only thing which the mind can never exhaust, never alienate, never be tortured by, never fear or distrust, and never dream of regretting. Learning is the only thing for you. Look what a lot of things there are to learn." — T.H. White, The Once and Future King

A website by Shanta Rohse on learning, technology and design

Recently in: Portable Learner

Portable Learner chihuahua

The continuing education of an educator

N
Social Networks and Happiness

It seems to be the case, online as well as offline, that when you smile, the world smiles with you:

We found that social net­works have clus­ters of happy and unhappy peo­ple within them that reach out to three degrees of sep­a­ra­tion. A person’s hap­pi­ness is related to the hap­pi­ness of their friends, their friends’ friends, and their friends’ friends’ friends — that is, to peo­ple well beyond their social hori­zon. We found that happy peo­ple tend to be located in the cen­ter of their social net­works and to be located in large clus­ters of other happy peo­ple. And we found that each addi­tional happy friend increases a person’s prob­a­bil­ity of being happy by about 9%.

♦ ♦ ♦

N
Obama In Your Heart

Ele­va­tion is one of a class of emo­tions that we feel when other peo­ple do good, skill­ful, or admirable things. These emo­tions are unusual in that they are not pri­mar­ily about our­selves, our goals, and our nor­mal petty con­cerns; rather, they make us feel like bet­ter peo­ple. Jonathan Haidt, who coined the term ele­va­tion, writes, “Pow­er­ful moments of ele­va­tion some­times seem to push a men­tal ‘reset but­ton,’ wip­ing out feel­ings of cyn­i­cism and replac­ing them with feel­ings of hope, love, and opti­mism, and a sense of moral inspi­ra­tion.” Barack Obama is appar­ently an off-the-charts ele­va­tion inducer. Haidt’s research shows that ele­va­tion is good at pro­vok­ing a desire to make a dif­fer­ence but not so good at moti­vat­ing real action. But he says the ele­va­tion effect is pow­er­ful nonethe­less. “It does appear to change peo­ple cog­ni­tively; it opens hearts and minds to new pos­si­bil­i­ties. This will be cru­cial for Obama.”

♦ ♦ ♦

E
Procrastinating Again?

Pro­cras­ti­na­tion is not a time-management prob­lem. It’s a com­plex prob­lem involv­ing per­son­al­ity, sit­u­a­tions and moti­va­tion. Every­one occa­sion­ally pro­cras­ti­nates, 15 to 20 per­cent of adults rou­tinely put off activ­i­ties that would be bet­ter accom­plished right away, and a whop­ping 80 to 95 per­cent of col­lege stu­dents have a pen­chant for post­pone­ment. Trisha Guru cov­ers con­tem­po­rary views on and advice for kick­ing the pro­cras­ti­na­tion habit.

♦ ♦ ♦

V
Technology Traps

I have a love/hate rela­tion­ship with tech­nol­ogy, much of my tur­moil stems from the fact that I do not always have the lux­ury of say­ing no or even, let me think about it, before it becomes a tech­nol­ogy I depend on. This is a symp­tom of what Peter Crabb calls tech­no­log­i­cal traps, con­se­quences of every­day deci­sions to use tech­no­log­i­cal devices that make us feel good when in fact these devices are not good for us or the planet at all:

With the help of human enthu­si­asts and enablers, tech­nol­ogy cre­ates its own self-affirming ide­ol­ogy. It is widely believed that tech­nol­ogy is infal­li­ble. Tech­nol­ogy must not be ques­tioned or crit­i­cized. Human needs are sub­or­di­nate to the needs of devices and sys­tems. If some­thing goes wrong, it must be due to “human error.” The solu­tion to technology-induced prob­lems is always more and bet­ter tech­nol­ogy. In fact, every arena of human activ­ity is always improved when the lat­est, most com­plex tech­nolo­gies are applied. As a con­se­quence of the ascen­dancy of tech­nol­ogy, humans have become demeaned and pow­er­less – second-class cit­i­zens in their own societies.

♦ ♦ ♦

A
The Ambassadors

The Ambas­sadors by Hans Hol­bein the Younger, is a por­trait of two French­men, one an ambas­sador to the court of King Henry VIII, the other a cleric. They are lean­ing on a cup­board with dis­plays — on the upper shelf objects refer­ring to the heav­ens; on the lower shelf, objects indi­cat­ing their earthly inter­ests. There are many hid­den mes­sages and mean­ings in this work, notes Don­ald Clark, includ­ing the large anamor­phic skull, which he has cho­sen to inter­pret in terms of learn­ing. The paint­ing reveals a 1533 cur­ricu­lum of the emerg­ing split between the voca­tional arts and acad­e­mia, and the retreat­ing role of reli­gion, a cur­ricu­lum whose influ­ence is clearly still felt some 500 years later.

♦ ♦ ♦

A
Group Think

The explo­sion of online mate­ri­als has two, some­what con­tra­dic­tory effects. The scope of avail­able infor­ma­tion expands, remark­ably so; but as a con­se­quence, the infor­ma­tion needs to be fil­tered some­how, and the fil­ter is either reverse chrono­log­i­cal order or popularity:

Many Inter­net users cus­tomize their con­sump­tion of news sources and other infor­ma­tion in a way that fos­ters polar­iza­tion. This, it could be argued, has ele­ments both of the nar­row­ing effect and the long tail. Amer­i­cans seek out sources that reflect their per­sonal beliefs, con­sis­tent with Anderson’s vision. But, akin to the nar­row­ing Evans observes, large groups — lib­er­als and con­ser­v­a­tives — con­verge on dif­fer­ent ref­er­ence points, result­ing in mutu­ally unrec­og­niz­able ver­sions of real­ity. The com­mon les­son of all of these phe­nom­ena is to be cog­nizant that the tools we use affect us in ways we may not fully appre­ci­ate. We should always be search­ing, the find­ings sug­gest, for new ways to search.

♦ ♦ ♦

R
Becoming Screen Literate

We are peo­ple of the screen now, says Kevin Kelly. When we were peo­ple of the writ­ten word, we devel­oped a long list of inno­va­tions and tech­niques to per­mit ordi­nary read­ers and writ­ers to manip­u­late text in ways that made it use­ful (think: quo­ta­tion sym­bols, tables of con­tents, page num­bers, indices, foot­notes, bib­li­o­graphic cita­tions, and of course, hyper­links). We will do the same to sup­port screen fluency:

With our fin­gers we will drag objects out of films and cast them in our own movies. A click of our phone cam­era will cap­ture a land­scape, then dis­play its his­tory, which we can use to anno­tate the image. Text, sound, motion will con­tinue to merge into a sin­gle inter­me­dia as they flow through the always-on net­work. With the assis­tance of screen flu­ency tools we might even be able to sum­mon up real­is­tic fan­tasies spon­ta­neously. Stand­ing before a screen, we could cre­ate the visual image of a turquoise rose, glis­ten­ing with dew, poised in a trim ruby vase, as fast as we could write these words. If we were truly screen lit­er­ate, maybe even faster. And that is just the open­ing scene.

♦ ♦ ♦

N
How To Run a Con

The key to a con is not that you trust the con­man, but that he shows he trusts you. Con­men ply their trade by appear­ing frag­ile or need­ing help, by seem­ing vul­ner­a­ble. Because of THOMAS, the human brain makes us feel good when we help oth­ers – this is the basis for attach­ment to fam­ily and friends and coop­er­a­tion with strangers. “I need your help” is a potent stim­u­lus for action.

♦ ♦ ♦

N
Amoebae Family Values

Single-celled organ­isms stick with rel­a­tives to avoid being duped when food becomes scarce. Sci­en­tists say the amoe­boid coop­er­a­tion con­tributes to our under­stand­ing of how some of the ear­li­est organ­isms may have bal­anced coop­er­a­tion with self-interest, essen­tial traits for social behav­iour.

♦ ♦ ♦

N
The End of Journalism

There have always been reporters, but will there always be pro­fes­sion­als? George Brock in his review of Robert Fox’s Eye­wit­ness to His­tory:

The idea and ideal of jour­nal­ism has been smudged and blurred by wor­ries about eco­nom­ics and the means of deliv­ery. The vehi­cles for report­ing have to adapt. The rivalry between print and the screen may evap­o­rate as screens become thin­ner, more flex­i­ble and more portable. The tra­di­tional bun­dle that is the news­pa­per, mag­a­zine or news bul­letin may morph into many dif­fer­ent ver­sions. But dig­i­tal com­mu­ni­ca­tions have not dam­aged lan­guage or its power. On the con­trary, screens and key­boards have allowed words to be pro­duced and con­sumed more widely and in greater quan­ti­ties than ever before. Ama­teurs and pro­fes­sional wit­nesses to events may com­pete, but together they enrich the writ­ten record. Per­haps Eye­wit­ness to His­tory stops at the dawn of a golden age of writing.“

♦ ♦ ♦